<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS FILTER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.css3.com/css-filter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.css3.com</link>
	<description>CSS3.com - A comprehensive CSS 3 reference guide, tutorial, and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webbed_Feet</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-18504</link>
		<dc:creator>Webbed_Feet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-18504</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so tired of cross-browser issues. When is everyone going to come to their senses and only use the best browser out there... FF. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so tired of cross-browser issues. When is everyone going to come to their senses and only use the best browser out there&#8230; FF. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosarito Beach Rentals</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-16524</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosarito Beach Rentals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-16524</guid>
		<description>IE specific properties like this should be considered for only in-house applications on an intranet, not the www.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE specific properties like this should be considered for only in-house applications on an intranet, not the www.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anupam</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-16511</link>
		<dc:creator>Anupam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-16511</guid>
		<description>I am stuck with this limitation of css.The addAmbient() method is not working for browsers other than IE.Why cant these guys follow a common standard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stuck with this limitation of css.The addAmbient() method is not working for browsers other than IE.Why cant these guys follow a common standard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thibaut Allender</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-15948</link>
		<dc:creator>Thibaut Allender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-15948</guid>
		<description>Sorry but MS proprietary effects have nothing to do on a website called &quot;css3.com&quot;!

On the other hand, it could be mentioned as an alternative to real CSS3 features like opacity (e.g. the alpha filter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but MS proprietary effects have nothing to do on a website called &#8220;css3.com&#8221;!</p>
<p>On the other hand, it could be mentioned as an alternative to real CSS3 features like opacity (e.g. the alpha filter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-15935</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-15935</guid>
		<description>How to view in these browsers? Well as far as transparency, browsers such as Firefox and Opera support the &quot;opacity&quot; property. RGBA is a new specification in CSS3 that allows alpha transparency (this is what the A at the end of RGB is for).

Personally, I liked the idea of the filter property. But the W3C did not support it because it&#039;s more of a scripting property than a presentation and style property. This is what I don&#039;t like about some of the new specs with CSS3. Years ago, they&#039;d keep behavioral (script) types of effects out of CSS. Now they want to add animation effects and it&#039;s getting approval. So although I don&#039;t have much of a problem with it (admittedly I like the idea of these effects), I do have a problem with that kind of double standard. They can&#039;t support filter as an appropriate specification, yet they&#039;re going to have animations and transformations in CSS3. Like I said, I don&#039;t mind it much, except for this double standard where filter is left out and other script-like effects aren&#039;t.

Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to view in these browsers? Well as far as transparency, browsers such as Firefox and Opera support the &#8220;opacity&#8221; property. RGBA is a new specification in CSS3 that allows alpha transparency (this is what the A at the end of RGB is for).</p>
<p>Personally, I liked the idea of the filter property. But the W3C did not support it because it&#8217;s more of a scripting property than a presentation and style property. This is what I don&#8217;t like about some of the new specs with CSS3. Years ago, they&#8217;d keep behavioral (script) types of effects out of CSS. Now they want to add animation effects and it&#8217;s getting approval. So although I don&#8217;t have much of a problem with it (admittedly I like the idea of these effects), I do have a problem with that kind of double standard. They can&#8217;t support filter as an appropriate specification, yet they&#8217;re going to have animations and transformations in CSS3. Like I said, I don&#8217;t mind it much, except for this double standard where filter is left out and other script-like effects aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-15882</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-15882</guid>
		<description>css filter effet is not supporting mozila and safari.

How to view in these browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>css filter effet is not supporting mozila and safari.</p>
<p>How to view in these browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gautam</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-15569</link>
		<dc:creator>Gautam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 09:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-15569</guid>
		<description>hello,
      I can understand the compatibility issues with other browser for this filter, but my question is can we use &quot;javascript&quot; with css to get this filter to work on other browsers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello,<br />
      I can understand the compatibility issues with other browser for this filter, but my question is can we use &#8220;javascript&#8221; with css to get this filter to work on other browsers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-12900</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-12900</guid>
		<description>I wish they were part of the standard too, but you know what they say, you can wish in one hand and crap in the other and see which hand gets filled up first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish they were part of the standard too, but you know what they say, you can wish in one hand and crap in the other and see which hand gets filled up first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zulqarnain Ansari</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-8387</link>
		<dc:creator>Zulqarnain Ansari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-8387</guid>
		<description>I wish it would be a part of w3C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish it would be a part of w3C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susmita</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.com/css-filter/comment-page-1/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>Susmita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.com/?p=113#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>css filter effet is not supporting mozila and safari.

How to view in these browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>css filter effet is not supporting mozila and safari.</p>
<p>How to view in these browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

